This forum is

**inactive**. Browsing/searching possible.
Connect your moderator Slack workspace to receive post notifications:

This forum is **inactive**. Browsing/searching possible.

Connect your moderator Slack workspace to receive post notifications:

## Problem set 3, compute the gradient for a cost function

Hello,

I don’t see that the provided solution gives us the behavior that we would expect. When we introduce the diagonal matrix many ‘features’ in X will be lost because they are multiplied with 0. And this is not what the indices notation shows.

How can I see that the solution (eq. 5) makes sense?

And for the same question part D. I don’t really buy the answer because if we have y = 100 and y_hat = 1, we will have very small loss and the function will not be sensitive to outliers (and it will not really take the relative error into account as claimed in the exercise)

## Add comment